let's not. right now shouldn't be the enemy of right. and voting is no substitue for deliberation.
- erik On Thu Mar 22 00:53:55 EDT 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > *** Off Topic *** > > I had a brief chat with "patch" and it strikes me now that the delay > in accepting complex patches might be alleviated if such patches could > be reviewed by 9fans, that is to say, publicly, by request. Say, for > example, that we are asked to comment on Axel's patch and we return a > verdict, as part of the "patch" process. No need to publish the > request, those interested can look on sources and post the result > there. > > Two factors would seem important: usefulness as well as correctness. > Maybe on a scale of 1 to 5. I don't know if I'm skilled enough to > alter patch/* accordingly, but I could try. > > ++L
