On 5/6/07, Rogelio Serrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/6/07, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> this absolutist argument that c is teh bomb. asm suks is silly. it's like
> arguing bicycles and ferraris. which one you need (and which one gets
> you there faster) depends on what you're doing.
>
exactly.
assembler is there because it is needed. if you are writing or porting
a compiler and you dont have an assembler you will end up writing one
anyway.
besides, its so easy to write one.
provided you have the instruction set manuals.
--
the thing i like with my linux pc is that i can sum up my complaints in 5 items
