On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 04:47:52PM -0600, Kim Shrier wrote:
I do agree with your assessment of GNU/Posix software.  However, I would
like to use this program that already runs on UNIX and (shudder) Windows,
on Plan 9.  I always hate it when people use the expediency argument on
me but the quickest way to get this running on Plan 9 is to port it over.
My intent, after I get it running, is to look at the software in detail
and see how I can adapt it to use Plan 9 idioms to get its job done.  Since
I won't need to port the Plan 9 updates back, I can be quite ruthless in
my rewriting.

Are you trying for an APE or native port? If APE, what is it that needs modifications?

--
Kris Maglione

The deficiency will never show itself during the test runs.

Attachment: pgp9i0sHrmIAZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to