> > have you compared its performance to webdav? > > I don't have any numbers with me, but I would expect 9P to work > faster than WebDAV since 9P works one layer below HTTP. > Implementation details aside, header-overhead in itself makes WebDAV > a less of a competitor.
Maybe, if you have ridiculously low latency. Which is one of the reasons I would like to see the latency issues addressed, so 9P services can work well over non-LAN networks. Maybe we can finally agree on a solution for this at this year's IWP9? Best wishes uriel
