We already agreed on a solution. Nobody is interested in implementing it.
On 9/8/07, Uriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > have you compared its performance to webdav? > > > > I don't have any numbers with me, but I would expect 9P to work > > faster than WebDAV since 9P works one layer below HTTP. > > Implementation details aside, header-overhead in itself makes WebDAV > > a less of a competitor. > > Maybe, if you have ridiculously low latency. Which is one of the > reasons I would like to see the latency issues addressed, so 9P > services can work well over non-LAN networks. Maybe we can finally > agree on a solution for this at this year's IWP9? > > Best wishes > > uriel > >
