I vote to Uriel. On 2007/10/29, at 3:43, Uriel wrote:
I'm still wondering what is the cost of having path be (/bin .) (other than running scripts actually becoming much faster when access to . is slow). For once I'm with don, just because perfect security is impossible doesn't mean we should stop trying to get closer to it, specially when the cost (as far as anyone has been able to tell in this case) is negligible. What is next? we get rid of file permissions 'because your coworkers can already pick the pile of papers lying on your desk so you should trust them anyway. Seeing this kinds of arguments is quite sad, specially given how far ahead plan9 is from every other system when it comes to *real* *practical* security. And I'm an idiot, but this whole discussion has become quite stupid. uriel
