I agree with Uriel as well. If you read my last post (I'll send it
again if you didn't get it), I noticed some problems and I hope to
find solutions or causes of them. Again, security is not my forte,
but I know how to do it.
On Oct 28, 2007, at 6:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote to Uriel.
On 2007/10/29, at 3:43, Uriel wrote:
I'm still wondering what is the cost of having path be (/bin .)
(other
than running scripts actually becoming much faster when access
to . is
slow).
For once I'm with don, just because perfect security is impossible
doesn't mean we should stop trying to get closer to it, specially
when
the cost (as far as anyone has been able to tell in this case) is
negligible.
What is next? we get rid of file permissions 'because your coworkers
can already pick the pile of papers lying on your desk so you should
trust them anyway.
Seeing this kinds of arguments is quite sad, specially given how far
ahead plan9 is from every other system when it comes to *real*
*practical* security.
And I'm an idiot, but this whole discussion has become quite stupid.
uriel
