On Nov 20, 2007 4:57 PM, Federico Benavento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > lsr, replica, for me are the same. > I don't wan't people to have to download > a big .tgz just because I edited one line > of code. Plus with the ported stuff it gets > worst, there are people that because > of lack of memory, or whatever can't > even build the libs, that's why I'm > including binaries
Maybe we could fix swap instead so people could actually build stuff without crashing their kernels? > replica was already there, I don't like replica, it is too fragile and too slow, but I don't think my opinion on this matters much. (Now that we have python we could use hg... although I fail to quite see the issue with plain tarballs) uriel >the principle > still applies, you can't keeping track > of files inside tar files is not the same. > > > > On Nov 20, 2007 12:53 PM, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > or we could just leave things as they are > > > making difficult to keep track of changes. > > > > if one is without replica, one can track changes on sources > > with history and ls -ltr. > > > > this is how i keep track of changes on my systems so > > it's more consistent, if not better, than using replica. > > > > - erik > > > > > > > > -- > Federico G. Benavento >
