On Nov 20, 2007 10:31 AM, Uriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 20, 2007 4:57 PM, Federico Benavento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > lsr, replica, for me are the same. > > I don't wan't people to have to download > > a big .tgz just because I edited one line > > of code. Plus with the ported stuff it gets > > worst, there are people that because > > of lack of memory, or whatever can't > > even build the libs, that's why I'm > > including binaries > > Maybe we could fix swap instead so people could actually build stuff > without crashing their kernels? > > > replica was already there, > > I don't like replica, it is too fragile and too slow, but I don't > think my opinion on this matters much. >
What fragility are you referring to? I've heard about it being fragile but am unable to find anything to back up the claim. Dave
