On Nov 20, 2007 10:53 AM, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > or we could just leave things as they are > > making difficult to keep track of changes. > > if one is without replica, one can track changes on sources > with history and ls -ltr. > > this is how i keep track of changes on my systems so > it's more consistent, if not better, than using replica.
by the way, if the datestamp of the file is not the current day (you know, cp -x), you'll miss the file this way. - erik
