Okay, thanks for clearing that up, cinap. That's pretty impressive, actually. Do you plan to put together some kind of package that we can just drop in and run? It makes a lot more sense to find that everything is run under Plan 9 :)
John On Jan 3, 2008 2:12 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Xserver is Xvnc running under linuxemu too... i connect with native > Plan9 vncv to it. The twm is from the ape/X distribution running native > on Plan9. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "John Floren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:39:05 -0500 > Subject: Re: [9fans] opera under linuxemu > Pardon me for be a doubting Thomas, but that screenshot looks a hell > of a lot like a VNC session. You know, with the X cursor in the top of > the window and the default X background behind it, and TWM providing > window decorations. Now, having file:/net/ open in one of the windows, > I don't know what's up :) > I'm sorry for being skeptical, but that's what I'm seeing. > > John > > On 1/2/08, Federico G. Benavento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hola, > > > > getting real static binaries in linux is a bit tricky and no one seems to > > be doing so, they always need ld-linux.so, libnss and others. > > cinap creates some kind of bundles that create a fake ns in /tmp/$lbun > > with this (http://9hal.ath.cx/usr/cinap_lenrek/lbun/mklbun) or something > > like, but I know he got opera running in Plan 9. > > http://9hal.ath.cx/usr/cinap_lenrek/plan9opera.png > > > > > > On Jan 2, 2008 9:55 PM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > anybody got a howto? I grabbed cinap's linuxemu from sources. Right > > > now I get this: > > > > > > cpu% ./8.out opera-9.25-20071214.1-static-qt.i386-en-687/bin/opera > > > opera-9.25-20071214.1-static-qt.i386-en-687/bin/opera: cant load > > > interpreter: '/lib/ld-linux.so.2' does not exist > > > cpu% bind -a /mnt/term/lib /lib > > > cpu% ./8.out opera-9.25-20071214.1-static-qt.i386-en-687/bin/opera > > > 8.out 20707: suicide: sys: trap: fault read addr=0x57425810 pc=0x57425810 > > > cpu% > > > > > > I am wondering if there is some simple thing I'm missing. I thought > > > static would not need ld-linux.so.2 but ... > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > ron > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Federico G. Benavento > > > > > -- > Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn > -- Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
