well, uClibc & dietlibc are rather limited. *BSD libc is a viable option, as is Sun's. Honestly though, if we're going to do something as radical as get rid of glibc, can we please do a little better? Might as well fix everything else wrong, like, oh, say BSD SOCKETS! =)
On Jan 3, 2008 2:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 17:42 -0800, ron minnich wrote: > > _dl_out_of_memory > > > > as in > > date: relocation error: /tmp/xcpu-hfyyo9/libc.so.6: symbol > > _dl_out_of_memory, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file > > ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 with link time reference > > > > ah well, here is the fix: > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-443049.html > > > > At some point, it's just amusing. > > I'm actually at loss why things like uClibc, dietlibc, > hey BSD libc or even Solaris one, don't displace that > horrible abomination called GNU libc. My only hope is that > evolution will run its due course eventually, but it is > so painful to watch its slow pace :-( > > Thanks, > Roman. > > -- "By cosmic rule, as day yields night, so winter summer, war peace, plenty famine. All things change. Air penetrates the lump of myrrh, until the joining bodies die and rise again in smoke called incense." "Men do not know how that which is drawn in different directions harmonises with itself. The harmonious structure of the world depends upon opposite tension like that of the bow and the lyre." "This universe, which is the same for all, has not been made by any god or man, but it always has been, is, and will be an ever-living fire, kindling itself by regular measures and going out by regular measures" -- Heraclitus
