> well, uClibc & dietlibc are rather limited. *BSD libc is a viable option, as > is Sun's. > Honestly though, if we're going to do something as radical as get rid of > glibc, can we please do a little better? Might as well fix everything else > wrong, like, oh, say BSD SOCKETS! > =)
sockets are not an invention of the c library, regardless of what drepper thinks. you'll have to swap out the operating system to do that. ... wait a second. - erik
