On Jan 23, 2008 7:36 PM, Iruata Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 23, 2008 2:13 PM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 23, 2008 6:17 AM, Iruata Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 23, 2008 7:35 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > flash doesn't have anything to do with compliance. nor does javascript. > > > speaking of the web, you should be compliant with what you choose to > > > implement. > > > if you only implement html and you're compliant with w3c, you are > > > compliant. > > > > and, arguably, useless. > > > > There is spec compliance and de-facto compliance. Or, maybe, spec > > compliance and > > what people want compliance. > > > that's true. but it's a little hard to state what is a > what-people-want compliance.
what-people-want is the Holy Trinity 2.0: Firefox, GCC and Linux. Anything else will never be 'compliant' (unless you are under the Job's distortion field...) uriel
