On Jan 23, 2008, at 11:13 AM, ron minnich wrote:
Nine out of ten times you'll hear "yes" but get "no" from the program. To be GCC compatible is to be a masochist. What people should be asking is, "is the compiler C99-compliant?" Personally, I see no need for most of the junk in C99 - its complex number system is unorthodox, it breaks compatibility with C++, and isn't restrict like noalias?One of the first questions users ask of a new C compiler is "are you gcc compliant?".
