> Why has it been so dificult to port GNULand to Plan 9 but not the other way
> arround?

That is the fundamental question: portability is in the "wrong"
direction.  Plan 9 code is clean and platform independent, GNU code
isn't: it is heavily biased in favour of GCC and is positively riddled
with platform dependencies.

Oh, C++ has much to do with it too.

++L

Reply via email to