On Jun 14, 2:17 pm, Simon Ewins <[email protected]> wrote: > [Bridge] > > >> Perhaps 'tested', partially now, in the future probably completely. Even > >> so, we measure and quantify love all the time. > > > But there's no number score is there? It's all subjective. > > There is a 'score' for each individual. Yes it is subjective but that > doesn't deny that it is measured, weighed and quantified. And it is the > senses that do the measuring, weighing and quantifying. Analysis of > where on the internal number scale depends upon sensing our own feelings > and measuring them. > > > Love more, love less, > >> love like a brother, love like a lover, love like a child. We all gauge > >> our love and other emotions. If we can measure and differentiate then we > >> are doing so empirically. > > > Is it more loving to let your child stay at home when they're 30 is it > > more loving to kick them out and make them learn to take care of > > themselves? > > As I say it is subjective, but that doesn't make it less measurable, > only measurable by less people. >
Then I'd say we agree. > -- > WARNING: This message is only readable empirically. > > "A thorough reading and understanding of the Bible is the surest path to > atheism." > [Donald Morgan] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "A Civil Religious Debate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/a-civil-religious-debate?hl=en.
