> since you have 24 more cores, with overclocking you should > still surpass my gtx260 since user interface responsiveness does > not limit performance very much.
I was hoping to beat you without overclocking. :) But max for me seems to be around 157.50/s... When activly using my computer I run at around 125/s and hardly notice the the GPU use (except noise). Thats at 602/1107 MHz. > as long as --work, --condition, --roundfunc and --chainlength > are the same, your chains are valid. it might still be a good > idea to write to a new file. in case you used wrong options > once you would have all the wrong chains isolated. Good to hear... But one more question about command line parameters. The generated command line uses "--work random:prefix=11,0". Random? Why is that? I stop the table generation and change runtime parameters several times a day depending on how I need to use the computer. Could I with this setting risk generating a sequence more than once? Wouldn't a sequencial generation be better? -Terje
_______________________________________________ A51 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51
