Well, a lot of research projects died because of 'pressure' by someone (big companies, governments) where pressures can be represented by a lot of things.
This email is to start a discussion on: "How to support and make the project evolve and survive?" I would really like to see reaching a stage of 'point-click-sniff' tools so that this research result would became the *most pervasive* privacy awareness actions on the global population ever done. But that kind of research is not like WiFi WEP crypto stuff, it's more sensible, more interests on it, more investments to be preserved and avoided. If a 'point-click-sniff' tool for GSM will not exists, citizens will continue to feel 'secure' that way and there would be no serious public actions. So, how to avoid that 'pressure' will make the research project never reach a 'point-click-sniff' tool, and how to support this development scenario while managing the 'pressure' ? Fabio _______________________________________________ A51 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51
