Nice! Is there a maximum number of connected usb-sticks for the
"master-usb-host-controller" of the motherboard?
How many usb sticks would you guys suggest to put together? 1*2*4*8 = 64
16GB Usb-Sticks for about 1TB with high performance access times?
The cheapest sticks I have seen until now were at the market for about 1
Euro per Gigabyte, e.g. the Kingston DataTraveler, isnt that a bit
expensive, paying 1000 Euro (= 1361 USD) for this Terabyte?

On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 10:02 +0100, Frank A. Stevenson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 07:11 +0100, sascha wrote:
> 
> > The access time for 4 usb sticks is already 0.3ms. Their combined size is
> > 64GB. Take 32 of these groups and you get down to 0.01ms (if it scales 
> > indeed).
> > What i was able to test was that it scales up to 16 devices. I got 0.08ms
> > access time with this configuration IIRC.
> > Even if you need 2 or even 4 distinct USB host adaptors to connect 128
> > devices, you still end up faster and cheaper than with SSD.
> > Besides that, those PCIe SSDs are still more expensive than 2.5inch SSDs.
> > And we certainly do not need hundreds of megabytes per second bandwidth.
> > The write performance is also of no concern.
> > 
> > As for the optimization of the USB bus, that comes for free. If you start
> > 4 CPU threads and manage to make each thread access the data blocks of
> > a single device, then the access time improvements scale linearly with the
> > number of devices.
> 
> Nice! It seems that USB mass storage should have us well covered for 5K
> requests a seconds :-) I did some further experiments on a single stick,
> and got access times down to 0.4ms when accessing the block device
> directly. (Which means we do away with the filesystem altogether.)
> 
> I added the test code to svn:
> tmto-svn/tinkering/various/speedy.cpp
> 
> typically you have to do "sudo time ./speedy /dev/sdX" and get timing
> figures for 10000 random reads. (Just under 4 seconds in my test)
> 
> F
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> A51 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51


_______________________________________________
A51 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51

Reply via email to