On Sun 15 Oct 2000 at 11:49AM +0100, Phil Taylor wrote:
>
> There is some scope for disagreement here. John Chambers wants
> global accidentals to be octave-specific unlike normal accidentals,
> so you can have both =C and ^c. That seems useful to me.
This may be useful, but it also introduces ambiguity. Does K:^f mean
sharpen the f in every octave or sharpen the f in just one octave ?
I usually make the assumption that an accidental in the key signature
applies to every octave, which rules out notation such as K:^f =F
James Allwright
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
