On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 05:21:56PM +0100, Bert Van Vreckem wrote: > After playing around with some examples from the chord discussion I > have the following remarks: > - C5 yields C E G instead of C G. That's a known bug. When I get a chance I'll fix it. > - Multiple modifiers seem to be impossible? e.g. Frank Nordberg's > Dmmaj13+11 (or Dm7add6add+11/C). use 'add' or '#', depending on whether you think + means 'add' or 'sharpen' There is a minor bug in there, though for some modifiers. > - + and maj don't seem t be accepted? > - "E7#9 is E G# B D Fx" -> what's Fx? x - double sharp -- Mike Whitaker | Work: +44 1733 766619 | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Architext | Fax: +44 1733 348287 | Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CricInfo Ltd | GSM: +44 7971 977375 | Web: http://www.cricinfo.com/ To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Laurie Griffiths
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Bob Archer
- RE: [abcusers] Chord notation Richard L Walker
- RE: [abcusers] Chord notation Richard L Walker
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Laurie Griffiths
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Robert Bley-Vroman
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Robert Bley-Vroman
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Mike Whitaker
- RE: [abcusers] Chord notation Richard L Walker
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Bert Van Vreckem
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Mike Whitaker
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation John Chambers
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Mike Whitaker
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Markus Lutz
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Mike Whitaker
- RE: [abcusers] Chord notation Richard L Walker
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Laurie Griffiths
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Jack Campin
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Mike Whitaker
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] Chord notation Frank Nordberg
