On Mon 19 Nov 2001 at 07:21AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A while ago James Allwright said - > > >The problem of abritrary text has come up before and "_ " is the agreed > >syntax for arbitrary text > > and more recently - > > >This was resolved ages ago. Q:120 takes the value of unit note length > >from the header. If there is a new L: field in the body of the tune, > >the tempo does not change with it ... > > Are these agreements (and others?) documented anywhere? >
The abcusers list archives perhaps ? This is several years ago. James Allwright To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
