Christoph Dalitz wrote:
> 
> AFAFIK, these terms do not apply to classical music notation but to
> mensural notation,
...

Not at all. The longa was used well into the 16th Century at least. The
brevis is occasionally found even today.

> which is currently not supported by abc at all.

(Well, actually BarFly does support mensural notation after a fashion -
although that's not the point here, of course)

> On the other hand it would be of not too much use, because worldwide
> only a handful of people can read it.

(I have to admit that my mensural notation skills is at about the same
level as my Spanish skills: I can read it if I really have to, but I'd
rather not. But again, mensural notation is not the point here.)

> 
> When transcribing medieval or early Renaissance music, the note values
> need to be matched to modern time values.

Well, "need" might not be the right word here...
Why don't you just skip over to the Musica Viva Renaissance Workshop:
http://www.musicaviva.com/ensemble/rv/index.tpl
Most of the music there are presented with their original note values,
and so far nobody has complained.

>
> The common practice is:
...

If "common" means "late 19th and early 20th Century", yes.

...
> for "perfect time" 3 the translation is different.

Not that much different. Ususally you just have to remember to add the
dots that were taken for granted in the original.

> 
> If I understand Laura right, she uses method a)
...

She doesn't. She always uses the original note values when she's transcribing.

> 
> Now my questions to Laura are:

(Hope you don't mind me answering them instead ;-)

> 
> What do you mean with "longa"?

Here are the English note value names. Each one on the list represent a
note value half the previous one:

  Maxima
  Longa
  Breve
  Semibreve
  Minim
  Crotchet
  Quaver
  Semiquaver
  Demisemiquaver
  Hemidemisemiquaver

> 
> Presumably a "quadruple note" would occur only on final notes.

Usually yes, but not always

> In most modern edition it is printed as a double note with a
> fermata. Is that not sufficient?

It isn't.

> 
> What would the music symbol be for a "quadruple note" in
> music and in tablature?

http://www.musicaviva.com/encyclopedia/display.tpl?phrase=Note%20values

In tablature, the brevis is notated as a fermata sign. I've never seen a
longa in tablature, so I don't know how that sign would be.

> Is it at all readable?

Sure.


Frank Nordberg
http://www.musicaviva.com
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to