> In some other fora, there has been much  discussion  lately
> of  the  Great Firewall of China, which is blocking Chinese
> access to all sorts of things on the Net.  Among  them  are
> most of the search sites, especially google.com, and all of
> mit.edu.  The folks at MIT are somewhat bemused by this, of
> course.   It's  not  like  there's  all  that  much Chinese
> political stuff on mit.edu machines.

"Somewhat bemused" is a quaint way to describe your weaseling
jobsworth Noah Meyerhans's attitude to malicious users hosted
by MIT.  MIT is no position to take any moral high ground over
censorship when its anonymizing spamsite nym.alias.edu conducts
denial-of-service attacks on public forums by drowning them in
crap - just scan through all postings made to rec.folk-dancing
with paths leading through lcs.mit.edu, the site Meyerhans manages.
Dictatorship by a gang of Ivy League frat boys is not one whit
morally better than by the Chinese gerontocracy.


> with the  search  sites  in  general,  and my abc tune finder
> in particular blocked (because it's at MIT), this  means  that
> Chinese  owners  of  music  would  have  a  lot  of trouble
> discovering copyright violations.

There can't be any.  Last I heard China wasn't party to any copyright
treaties.  It neither recognizes nor enforces copyrights, and there's
nothing in international law that says they have to.  So they have no
rights that could be violated.

I suspect Hong Kong retained some special status, otherwise its film
industry would have gone down the toilet by now.


> Do we have people here who  are  transcribing  Chinese  pop
> music?  Actually, I'd be more interested in the traditional
> music, but new music is more interesting as a test case.

I have "The East is Red" in the modes tutorial on my website;
apparently the tune is traditional.  I could put the rest of
the book up, I suppose (most of the tunes presumably composed
in the Fifties).  The Chinese official attitude to it, if they
ever found it was there and actually cared, would more likely
be that they'd want it taken down as a political embarrassment
drawing attention to abandoned principles than any concern over
lost royalties.


(And getting totally OT: there was a programme on Radio 3 a while
ago which I only heard part of, comprising letters from a woman
worker in an infernal toy factory in the Shenzhen free enterprise
zone; like an update on Charles Denby, Satoshi Kamata or Gunter
Wallraff for the new millennium.  I presume they've been published
as a book; anybody know what?)

=================== <http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/> ===================


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to