In my view of things, removing the C:Composer field steps just over the line in being too radical :0( I really like to see this header just under the title, where it doesn't get lost.

Retaining the identity of the composer is paramount in importance to knowing the name of the tune, and thus it needs its own header, separate from having this information buried in an Index line. If you see a C: in a list of headers, then it serves as gentle reminder that this is an entry that really should be filled out.

Does using A-G, X and Z in a header ever cause confusion with a notes and rests? I honestly don't see how, but if so, please explain it to me. Seriously.

Don

At 07:51 AM 7/18/2003, Tom Novelli wrote:

I've been working on an Abc 2.0 proposal, which is a stripped-down version
of 1.6.  Amongst other things, I removed most of the headers (notably
A-G, X and Z, to avoid confusion with notes and rests).  I admit
it's a little radical :)   http://bespin.org/~tom/abc2-tcn.txt


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to