Henrik Norbeck wrote: >I haven't been able to follow the discussion closely, since I'm away >on vacation. Forgive me if I repeat things that have already been >discussed, but here are a few important things I want to point out: > >3.1.13. H: - The multiline version should be deprecated, i.e. the >version where every line begins with H: is preferred.
Why? I don't see why fields which simply contain text should not continue until the next field identifier is reached (N: too, as long as it's in the header). >3.3.5. %%abc-include - Why use .abh as an extension? Why not >.abch? Or are we still limited to 8+3 chars for file names? Why do we need to specify an extension at all? >4.3. Note lengths: There should also be an example of e.g. A3/ as >shorthand for A3/2 Yes. >4.17. Chords and unisons: The possibility to use broken rhythm >markers > and < with chords should be explicitly mentioned. Yes. >4.18. Chords symbols: To avoid confusion with [] chords, maybe >these should be renamed to "backing chords" or something >similar. Yes. >2.2. Continuation of input lines: The way it is defined for w: fields is >unacceptable to me. There's been a lot of discussion of this over the last few weeks. That's not to say that the subject is closed, of course, but you'll probably want to review your back mail before starting a new discussion. Phil Taylor To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
