On 6/20/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 6/20/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'd say the goals for M1 are pretty simple... > >> produce a stable, reasonably functional impl for folks to start working >> with. Where "reasonbly functional" means it implements the RFC4287 with >> no obvious gaps. > > That makes sense to me, although one question to think about here is > how stable the parser/object model API will be at this point. > stable == the svn will be tagged at a specific point.
Well, obviously, any release gets tagged at a specific point, what I'm getting at is are we going to say "these APIs will only evolve in a backwards compatible manner going forward", or is this a pre-1.0 liable to change, use at your own risk kind of release. -garrett
