Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 6/20/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Garrett Rooney wrote: >> > On 6/20/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I'd say the goals for M1 are pretty simple... >> > >> >> produce a stable, reasonably functional impl for folks to start >> working >> >> with. Where "reasonbly functional" means it implements the RFC4287 >> with >> >> no obvious gaps. >> > >> > That makes sense to me, although one question to think about here is >> > how stable the parser/object model API will be at this point. >> > >> >> stable == the svn will be tagged at a specific point. > > Well, obviously, any release gets tagged at a specific point, what I'm > getting at is are we going to say "these APIs will only evolve in a > backwards compatible manner going forward", or is this a pre-1.0 > liable to change, use at your own risk kind of release.
I'd rather this be a pre-1.0. We need more feedback from the community and road tests for the API. -Elias
