Hi Garrett, What do you think about the current testing capabilities? If it's sufficient, then there is no need to mess with it. I think the test cases are fairly sparse and we would probably need more. If there will be more test cases, it is worthwhile to evaluate other testing frameworks since JUnit 3.8 has been modernized in the form of JUnit 4 and TestNG.
Honestly, I'm not sure what the point of an evaluation is until we've actually hit something we can't do with our existing test infrastructure.
I think what you are saying is good for saving limited resources, but to find something you cannot do with your existing infrastructure you need only look as far as the JUnit 4 or TestNG features. Here's an orthogonal question, why is it that Abdera can be built with ant and maven, when there is make? If there was a java project building with make, would it make sense to look at the alternatives? Joe
