On 8/13/07, Brian Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/11/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The xml handling part of it it really orthogonal to the spring > > AbderaServlet. The XML handling part is for configuring a > ServiceContext. > > The HttpRequestHandlerServlet approach, as I understand, it can't really > > replace this - it could only replace the AbderaServlet which is pretty > > simple itself. Does that make sense or am I off in my understanding of > what > > you're describing? > > nope, that's the way i understood it. seems a bit redundant to > introduce an abdera-specific servlet that does pretty much exactly > what HRHS does, but as you point out, that's not a large part of the > patch.
I see your point. I'm on the fence about it - I suppose if you already have HRHS declared, then its probably less work to do it that way. Otherwise its probably less work to do it the AbderaSpringServlet way. i suppose the xml stuff is just a convenience for making the > configuration more compact and readable, yes? i have no objection to > that, other than noting how much java code we have to provide to > reduce the number of xml situps we have to do ;) > Yeah, the spring people certainly don't make it easy on us in that regard. Most of that code is boiler plate from other projects that I've written, so it may be a bit more verbose than it needs to be. - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
