Yeah, I'm sort of wondering whether we want two sessions, not whether we want a shorter session. I don't think I have a sufficient case to argue for two sessions though, so going with the chairs' 2.5 hour request seems good.
I suspect there will be a number of technical details that will eat up time and I suspect we could definitely have a long discussion of the architecture draft. Speaking of which, please read and comment on the new architecture draft! _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
