-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/04/2011 09:55 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Yeah, I'm sort of wondering whether we want two sessions, not whether we
> want a shorter session.
> I don't think I have a sufficient case to argue for two sessions though,
> so going with the chairs' 2.5 hour request seems good.
It is so requested. I'm not sure if the scheduling has an early bird
special but at least we won't be last :)
>
> I suspect there will be a number of technical details that will eat up
> time and I suspect we could definitely have a long discussion of the
> architecture draft.
> Speaking of which, please read and comment on the new architecture
> draft!
Indeed. We the chairs want those reviews and document updates to start
coming in now!
Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk0ji98ACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnf99ACfTK0Un7SiFl5xcXtw9z7YM8Bm
dqsAoKPWMDPQZR2hCoy2uzzzsJuQsDca
=G2ju
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
