On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Sam Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm fine with this plan for the future. However if we're going to do > that we should publish the existing naming exts document roughly as-is > so people have something to work with while we futz. > > (I note we're kind of in the wrong WG for this discussion.)
There are API designs that do less violence to the existing one, so that's something to discuss at KITTEN WG, as you point out. For now it's good enough to know that we have to deal with this problem. Nico -- _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
