I apparently have a lack of understanding here.  I had the assumption that I
would be creating a single gss-api session to talk to the service provider
and all conversations would be occurring in this single context.  If they
are different contexts then I think that architecture document needs to make
this much clearer.

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Sam Hartman
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:27 AM
> To: Josh Howlett
> Cc: Jim Schaad; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [abfab] Session Naming on GSS-API
> 
> Why wouldn't these two separate EAP sessions belong to separate gssapi
> context and thus separate initiator names?
> Also, Nico had been considering proposing adding a mechanism to add an
> issuer to a name attribute which may help here.
> _______________________________________________
> abfab mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to