On 21 Dec 2010, at 18:31, Eliot Lear wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> We give to you the holiday present of reading ;-)  The authors have updated 
> The ABFAB Architecture Draft.  It contains a number of changes since -00:
>       • A high level step by step description of the process.
>       • A "swimming lane" diagram visually demonstrating that process.
>       • A discussion about channel binding and appropriate EAP methods.
>       • A discussion about discovery.

Think it's looking pretty good in general, and agree with general comments made 
so far.

One specific comment that I don't think anybody else has made yet - the 
document variously refers to:
* End Host
* Client App
* Application
* Subject
* Principal
* Entity

- sometimes meaning the same thing, sometimes different things.

Where the document is using the very specific meaning of one term (e.g. subject 
vs principal) that should probably be clarified somewhere (terminology 
section?) and where it isn't using the term with that specific meaning attached 
then the document should pick one and stick with it for consistency.

Best Regards,
R.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Rhys Smith                                   e: [email protected]
Engineering Consultant: Identity & Access Management  (GPG:0xDE2F024C)
Information Services,
Cardiff University,                            t: +44 (0) 29 2087 0126
39-41 Park Place, Cardiff,                     f: +44 (0) 29 2087 4285
CF10 3BB, United Kingdom.                      m: +44 (0) 7968 087 821
----------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to