> I think there is another possible downside here that needs to be considered,
> without having a mic on all of the data that you are trying to protect,
> there is a possibility that either something that should be mic-ed isn't or
> something that is mic-ed is removed from the set.


Right, although a MIC that requires ordering (i.e. has sequence numbers) can 
mitigate against this. I do think though that if we can find an inexpensive way 
to protect the entire conversation, it simplifies things considerably, and will 
make it easier to add extensions in the future.

-- Luke
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to