-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/23/2011 03:58 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I think it would be helpful to have an on-list discussion about what's
> needed for various documents.
> I'll be happy to start something for aaa-saml, architecture, gss-eap and
> gss-eap-naming.
> Any chance the chairs could comment or recruit comments on
> applicability?
Why not just have the editors update the various documents and solicit
review and comment like we normally do in the IETF?
The chairs are busy pinging people in the background to fulfill their
commitments from the last IETF to review and comment but I suspect an
update of aaa-saml, gss-eap and gss-eap-naming might speed things along
assuming there are resolved issues that can be reflected in a new version.
Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk58knsACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZndqegCggqJwaEXDMT58ttbW65uOD4bI
AVIAoIfU5wnEvlowA40qbI9mnImsKKaY
=UmBG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
