On Sep 23, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Leif Johansson wrote: > > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/23/2011 03:58 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: >> I think it would be helpful to have an on-list discussion about what's >> needed for various documents. >> I'll be happy to start something for aaa-saml, architecture, gss-eap and >> gss-eap-naming. >> Any chance the chairs could comment or recruit comments on >> applicability? > > Why not just have the editors update the various documents and solicit > review and comment like we normally do in the IETF? > > The chairs are busy pinging people in the background to fulfill their > commitments from the last IETF to review and comment but I suspect an > update of aaa-saml, gss-eap and gss-eap-naming might speed things along > assuming there are resolved issues that can be reflected in a new version. >
just to add to this, I have talked to Josh and he promised to bring forward a new AAA-SAML draft that encompasses the issues Jim and you raised asap. I expect some lively discussion on that both on the list and in the meeting, given that the proposed changes trickle down in the other documents. Klaas
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
