On 10/18/11 8:17 PM, "Sam Hartman" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Well, note that anything coming out of attribute mapping in your SP is >completely separate and is unprefixed; the administrator is assumed >to know their own policy.
That's generally true, but it's still desirable for applications sitting on top to be able to distinguish between a piece of data from one source vs. another. >So, I'd prefer the context be fixed. I think we need it to be fixed for >GSS-EAP. If the use cases for ECP are going to be different then we >should consider that. However it would be valuable if you could plug one >in case of the other. I guess the way I look at it is that as a consumer of the GSS naming extensions, I'd be physically ill shipping code that hardcoded any names, so I see it all as a config time question. But then I'm also accused of designing systems that are too complex. -- Scott _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
