On 10/19/11 11:07 AM, "Nico Williams" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Cantor, Scott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I actually prefer urn:oid: because arguments over names are endless and >> non-terminating. > >We have names because OIDs were too inconvenient... :) I know, and there's a high degree of overlap between the people who complain about them and the people who bitch endlessly at whatever name you pick. I care little for either set. >> As a second choice, maybe urn:ietf:kitten:something? > >I don't think we want WG names in there. Something like >urn:ietf:security:nattr:...? Given that it's explicitly meant as a GSS-API naming extension, maybe just use gssapi in the name. -- Scott _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
