DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA wrote: > This alternative would be ideal, as long as > (1) It is likely to be accepted and implemented.
There have bee a number of discussions about extending the 4K limit for RADIUS over TCP. So the possibility of acceptance is there. Implementations will follow. > (2) We are talking about not having any packet size limit, what I'd say would > match with "TCP style" There will still be a limit of 64K, due to the RADIUS protocol headers. > What's you opinion on this? Would ABFAB help in building the case for it? Yes. Having use-cases means it's easier to standardize something. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
