>>>>> "Cantor," == Cantor, Scott <[email protected]> writes:
Cantor,> On 11/28/11 10:04 AM, "Sam Hartman"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm generally in favor of exploring both relaxing the 4k limit
>> and/or defining a mechanism so that SAML attributes can be spread
>> across multiple messages.
>>
>> I'm not generally in favor of defining a generic radius
>> fragmentation message.
Cantor,> Obviously I want to see the limit dealt with, but I would
Cantor,> note that SAML is not the issue here, the user data is. The
Cantor,> XML framing is not a significant source of size, and the
Cantor,> problem won't be any different with JWT.
OK, well, I'm happy with the direction Alan is going in which seems to
be a service type related to user data.
What I didn't want was something at the radius messaging layer so deep
in tchanging RADIUS that it could never get standardized.
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
