>>>>> "Alejandro" == Alejandro Perez Mendez <[email protected]> writes:

    Alejandro> The problem with this case is that the intermediate proxy
    Alejandro> will need to perform a conversation with the RADIUS
    Alejandro> client (i.e. sending Acess-Challenge packets) to obtain
    Alejandro> all the fragments of the packet. Then, the proxy have to
    Alejandro> reconstruct the assertion, modify it and then start a new
    Alejandro> conversation with the RADIUS server sending the new
    Alejandro> fragments.

    Alejandro> I think it is possible, but that may be a lot of state to
    Alejandro> hold for a proxy.

I'm confused because I thought the proxy would end up having to first
have a conversation with the RADIUS server.
Do you have server and client reversed?
If not, would you help me better understand what's going on?

Is the proxy's state required any more than the state a server needs to
retain for its outstanding fragmented requests?

--Sam
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to