>>>>> "Klaas" == Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng) <[email protected]> writes:
Klaas> On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:18 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
Klaas> Hi Sam,
Klaas> I can not recall having discussed this explicitly in a
Klaas> meeting, but that does't mean it didn't happen, it may be
Klaas> that I am just getting old ;-)
I'm thinking that if it were discussed it was a couple of comments at
the mic.
So, it was not discussed as much as I thought it had been in my initial
response to the secdir comments.
my preference is to treat this as something we did not seriously
consider and should seriously consider prior to approval.
Klaas> Is there a compelling reason NOT to add an escaping mechanism apart
from simplicity? It does not seem to add that much complexity
.
Klaas> Klaas
I can't think of one.
I'll note that adopting the krb5 escaping mechanism will be kind of
convenient for the Moonshot implementation as we seem to implement it
already and it's more convenient than removing the code.
If we are going to do an escaping mechanism I'd appreciate it if someone
could help me with the ABNF.
--Sam
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
