Hi, On Jul 19, 2012, at 12:09 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Klaas" == Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng) <[email protected]> writes: > > Klaas> On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:18 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: > > Klaas> Hi Sam, > > Klaas> I can not recall having discussed this explicitly in a > Klaas> meeting, but that does't mean it didn't happen, it may be > Klaas> that I am just getting old ;-) > > I'm thinking that if it were discussed it was a couple of comments at > the mic. > So, it was not discussed as much as I thought it had been in my initial > response to the secdir comments. > > my preference is to treat this as something we did not seriously > consider and should seriously consider prior to approval. I agree > Klaas> Is there a compelling reason NOT to add an escaping mechanism apart > from simplicity? It does not seem to add that much complexity.. > > Klaas> Klaas > > I can't think of one. > > I'll note that adopting the krb5 escaping mechanism will be kind of > convenient for the Moonshot implementation as we seem to implement it > already and it's more convenient than removing the code. > > If we are going to do an escaping mechanism I'd appreciate it if someone > could help me with the ABNF. sure Klaas _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
