On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:42 AM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote:
Jim, > I will be doing a full read over the next couple of days, but I did not see > anything that jumped out to me as a problem with the diff. That is great. I'll do the writeup and wait for your "no objection" before submitting it. I'll go on holiday on Saturday, so it'll have to be on Friday at the latest. Thanks, Klaas > > Jim > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >> Of Sam Hartman >> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:16 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [abfab] I-D Action: draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-09.txt >> >> >> >> Hi. I think we have consensus on all the changes in this version, but I'd > really >> appreciate it if one or two people would read the diff between 08 and 09 > and >> confirm that I didn't introduce any problems. I think it's all good but > there >> were a lot of post-approval comments to resolve. >> >> --Sam >> _______________________________________________ >> abfab mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab > > _______________________________________________ > abfab mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
