On Aug 14, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Klaas Wierenga <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:42 AM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jim, > >> I will be doing a full read over the next couple of days, but I did not see >> anything that jumped out to me as a problem with the diff. > > That is great. I'll do the writeup and wait for your "no objection" before > submitting it. I'll go on holiday on Saturday, so it'll have to be on Friday > at the latest. ooops, please ignore, I was mixing eap and eap-naming Klaas > > Thanks, > > Klaas > > >> >> Jim >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >>> Of Sam Hartman >>> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:16 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [abfab] I-D Action: draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-09.txt >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi. I think we have consensus on all the changes in this version, but I'd >> really >>> appreciate it if one or two people would read the diff between 08 and 09 >> and >>> confirm that I didn't introduce any problems. I think it's all good but >> there >>> were a lot of post-approval comments to resolve. >>> >>> --Sam >>> _______________________________________________ >>> abfab mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab >> >> _______________________________________________ >> abfab mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab > > _______________________________________________ > abfab mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
