>
> This "MUST" cannot be implemented. It's not clear what an implementor "must"
> be doing to comply.
> This is merely telling us "there's a problem, you MUST deal with it".
> This reads more like recognition of an issue, rather than a solution.
I' going to weigh in (as an individual) on this point.
There is (imo) nothing inherently problematic about calling out a problem that
needs to be addressed in another specification, especially when writing an
applicability statement.
Cheers Leif
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
