Hi Hannes, We were advised by the ABFAB Chairs that we needed to get consensus on a problem statement before we could work on the solution documents in ABFAB. The -ps document were an attempt to document a problem statement for that purpose.
I think that all of the still-pertinent information in the multihop-fed document has been moved to the Trust Router protocol document, and multihop-fed has been abandoned. Let me know if I've missed anything you would like to see preserved. Margaret On Mar 12, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> wrote: > Btw, I never understood why Josh, Rhys, and Margaret suddenly started a new > document. > I like draft-mrw-abfab-multihop-fed-02 more. > > On Mar 12, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: > >>>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> writes: >> >> Hannes> Here is also a good document related to this topic: >> Hannes> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mrw-abfab-multihop-fed-02 >> >> >> The multihop federation document is somewhat out of date. >> we believe that the introductory text from that document has been >> migrated to the new protocol document. >> >> --Sam > > _______________________________________________ > abfab mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
